U.S. high court says Colorado must refund exonerated defendants




  • In US
  • 2017-04-19 17:29:28Z
  • By By Andrew Chung

By Andrew Chung

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down a Colorado law that allowed the state to keep fees and restitution paid by criminal defendants even when their convictions are overturned, calling it an unconstitutional violation of their rights.

The court sided with two people whose sexual assault convictions were thrown out. The justices ruled 7-1 that a 2013 Colorado law called the Exoneration Act, which forced cleared defendants to prove their innocence in a subsequent lawsuit before getting back money paid to the state after conviction, violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of due process.

Writing for the court, liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg criticized the Colorado policy of keeping exonerated defendants' money because at that point they are once again presumed to be innocent.

"Colorado may not presume a person, adjudged guilty of no crime, nonetheless guilty enough for monetary exactions," Ginsburg wrote.

Shortly after January oral arguments in the case, Colorado officials proposed a bill in the state legislature to fall in line with other states and make it easier to recoup conviction-related penalties. The bill passed last month and takes effect in September.

The case involved two convicted defendants who were later exonerated. Shannon Nelson was found guilty in 2006 in Arapahoe County of incest and abuse of her four children. She was given a 20-year prison sentence and ordered to pay more than $8,100 in court costs, fees and restitution.

Her conviction was overturned due to trial error, and she was acquitted after a retrial. Nelson's brother and his wife meanwhile were convicted of sexually assaulting the children.

Louis Alonzo Madden was convicted in La Plata County in 2005 after he allegedly propositioned a 14-year-old girl who was a passenger on the trolley he was driving, then pinned her against a window and sexually assaulted her, according to court papers. He was given prison time and more than $4,400 in related fees and restitution. His convictions were later set aside.

Both defendants' bids to get back money they had paid failed in 2015 when the Colorado Supreme Court said it could authorize repayment only if they sued under the Exoneration Act, which was meant to compensate the wrongfully convicted.

They appealed, and the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Colorado's argument that the funds belonged to the state because the convictions were in place when the funds were taken. Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone dissenter.

Only eight of the nine justices took part in the ruling because the case was argued before Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the court on April 10.



(Reporting by Andrew Chung in New York; Editing by Will Dunham)

COMMENTS

More Related News

Trump slams federal court ruling on funding for
Trump slams federal court ruling on funding for 'sanctuary cities'
  • US
  • 2017-04-27 01:18:01Z

President Donald Trump on Wednesday attacked a federal judge's ruling that blocked his executive order seeking to withhold funds from "sanctuary cities" for illegal immigrants, vowing to appeal it to the U.S. Supreme Court. Tuesday's ruling by U.S. District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco was the latest blow to Trump's efforts to toughen immigration enforcement. "First the Ninth Circuit rules against the ban & now it hits again on sanctuary cities-both ridiculous rulings.

US Supreme Court takes narrow view on tribal immunity
US Supreme Court takes narrow view on tribal immunity

The US Supreme Court took a narrow view Tuesday on the immunity from lawsuits enjoyed by Native American tribes, which are treated in some respects like sovereign states that cannot be sued in American courts. In a case involving a limousine driver who rear-ended a car on a Connecticut freeway, the highest court in the land ruled unanimously that tribal employees do not always have immunity when involved in incidents that take place far from reservations. The justices revived a civil lawsuit filed by the injured occupants of the car in state court, overturning the Connecticut Supreme Court's decision to dismiss the case because the driver worked for the Mohegan Tribe, which runs a...

The Latest: US judge lifts temporary execution stay
The Latest: US judge lifts temporary execution stay

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) - The Latest on Arkansas' attempt to carry out the nation's first double execution since 2000 (all times local):

US Supreme Court opts to leave CIA
US Supreme Court opts to leave CIA 'torture report' secret

The US Supreme Court on Monday turned back an appeal by rights groups seeking to make public a damning report on the CIA's post-September 11 torture program, ensuring it will remain secret. The court rebuffed arguments from the American Civil Liberties Union that the highly classified report, compiled in 2014 by the Senate Intelligence Committee, should be released based on US government transparency rules. "We are disappointed by this major setback for government transparency and accountability.

Justices turn away appeal from Houston man shot by police
Justices turn away appeal from Houston man shot by police

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from a Houston man shot in the back by police during a traffic stop, prompting Justice Sonia Sotomayor to complain of a "disturbing trend" in how the high court deals with cases alleging police misconduct.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: US

facebook
Hit "Like"
Don't miss any important news
Thanks, you don't need to show me this anymore.