Editorial: Saving the supremes: Packing the Supreme Court should be off the table, but (long) term limits may well make sense




  • In Business
  • 2021-12-21 09:00:00Z
  • By NY Daily News

In a 288-page report as long and detailed as any Supreme Court ruling, a 34-member, bipartisan presidential commission couldn't reach consensus on whether the nation's highest judicial panel should grow from nine, where it's been since 1869, to some larger number. It should've been easy, especially for a panel so large, to grasp: Of course having a president pack the court won't solve any of its underlying problems.

To the contrary, letting the chief executive enlarge the bench that issues the final word on constitutional law and statutory interpretation would snap the final, frayed thread of credibility by which the court now hangs, forcing presidents of each party to retaliate with new lifetime appointments of their own. No doubt, Republicans have been primarily responsible for politicizing the court - but a move by President Biden to add new liberals now would be like deploying a hydrogen bomb in a fission nuclear war.

Three decisions by presidents and Senate majority leaders have produced the court's current six-to-three conservative supermajority, one likely to overrule Roe v. Wade and embrace a radical interpretation of the Second Amendment that nullifies life-saving gun safety laws. Most devious was Mitch McConnell's 2016 refusal to give President Obama's moderate pick of Judge Merrick Garland a hearing after Antonin Scalia's death early that year. That was followed by the installation of Neil Gorsuch in the seat, capped off by the mad rush to approve President Trump's nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, following the late 2020 death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

It may pain Democrats to refuse to go deeper down the route of politicizing the court, but someone has to be the relative grownup if one of the nation's most important institutions has any hope of surviving a dangerously divisive moment. Generous term limits for justices would help balance the court ideologically rather than incentivizing the appointment of young zealots and leaving so much to when a lifetime appointee happens to die. Don't pack a court on the brink; find a way to bring it back.

___

COMMENTS

More Related News

A British Citizen Was Identified As The Man Who Took Hostages At A Texas Synagogue
A British Citizen Was Identified As The Man Who Took Hostages At A Texas Synagogue
  • US
  • 2022-01-16 18:38:16Z

"This was an act of terror," President Biden said of the incident.View Entire Post ›

Tim Kaine: Build Back Better is "dead" but core provisions will pass
Tim Kaine: Build Back Better is "dead" but core provisions will pass

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) told CBS' "Face the Nation" on Sunday he believes the core of President Biden's Build Back Better legislation will pass but...

Poll: Half of Americans
Poll: Half of Americans 'Frustrated,' 'Disappointed' with Biden's Presidency

Half of respondents in a new CBS News poll released Sunday said they were "frustrated" and "disappointed" with President Biden's presidency.

DOJ raises stakes with rarely used sedition charges for Oath Keepers
DOJ raises stakes with rarely used sedition charges for Oath Keepers
  • US
  • 2022-01-16 11:00:08Z

The seditious conspiracy charges brought by the Justice Department Thursday against the leader of the Oath Keepers and other members of the right-wing group ...

Tom Cotton Senate bill would separate prison inmates by birth gender, not identity
Tom Cotton Senate bill would separate prison inmates by birth gender, not identity
  • US
  • 2022-01-16 10:32:14Z

A prisoner's gender at birth, not their gender identity, would determine where they would be housed, under a U.S. Senate bill proposed last week by...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Business