Supreme Court won't block Biden rule on societal cost of greenhouse gases




  • In Politics
  • 2022-05-26 18:33:16Z
  • By NBC News
 

The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to block a Biden administration rule for figuring the costs of greenhouse gas pollution when the government makes decisions affecting the environment.

Ten red states, led by Louisiana, asked court to put a hold on a January 2021 White House executive order that directs an interagency working group to generate estimates for the societal costs of increased emissions of carbon, methane and nitrous oxide. The estimates are to be used to figure the monetary value of changes in these emissions resulting from government actions.

The states filed their emergency application to Justice Samuel Alito, who handles appeals from that region of the country. He referred the case to the full court, which denied the request without comment.

The loss for the states gives the Biden administration a boost in the president's efforts to include an evaluation of the risks of global in the federal government's decisions.

The states said the federal formulas inflated the estimated costs of oil and gas leasing and a host of other projects. They filed a lawsuit in federal court in Louisiana, and in February U.S. District Court Judge James D. Cain, Jr. temporarily blocked the use of the cost estimates.

The government appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a stay of that ruling. The states then asked the Supreme Court to lift that stay and let the judge's ruling take effect.

In an emergency application, they called the Biden working group's efforts "a power grab designed to manipulate America's entire federal regulatory apparatus through speculative costs so that the administration can impose its preferred policy outcomes on every sector of the American economy."

They said the court should block "the most consequential rulemaking in American history" while the lower courts decide its fate.

But the Biden administration said the states were acting prematurely, rushing to court before they knew what kind of effect the cost estimates will have. They should have waited and then challenged some future agency regulations that are actually issued, Justice Department lawyers said.

COMMENTS

More Related News

While wealthy women may have an easier time accessing abortion after the fall of Roe v. Wade, money can
While wealthy women may have an easier time accessing abortion after the fall of Roe v. Wade, money can't protect them from medical emergencies criminalized by abortion bans

One in 50 pregnancies is ectopic and requires an abortion to save the life of the mother, regardless of her financial status. Abortion bans may delay or...

Abortion rights: HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra says overcoming Dobbs won
Abortion rights: HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra says overcoming Dobbs won't 'be easy'

HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra asks legislators in favor of abortion rights to 'give us some good ideas.'

Biden administration weighs extraordinary action to make your mortgage cheaper
Biden administration weighs extraordinary action to make your mortgage cheaper

The Biden administration may trim mortgage costs for new and low-income homebuyers in a move to make homebuying more accessible.

Kamala Harris Compares Roe Reversal to Slavery
Kamala Harris Compares Roe Reversal to Slavery

On Saturday, Vice President Kamala Harris compared the reversal of the Roe v. Wade decision to a darker time in U.S. history when the government tried to...

Alejandro Mayorkas:
Alejandro Mayorkas: 'Remain in Mexico' end will take weeks; people told not to cross border

The "Remain in Mexico" policy will end, but not immediately, the DHS leader said. The Supreme Court ruling will take time to work through the courts.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Politics