Trump and his allies are demanding the Mar-A-Lago affidavit be released, but aides warn this is 'never good' for the defendant

Former President Donald Trump in a red tie.
Former President Donald Trump in a red tie.  
  • Despite demands from Trump and his allies to make the affidavit public, aides warn it could backfire.

  • The search warrant and inventory list have already been made public by a federal judge.

  • The DOJ says releasing the affidavit could cause "irreparable damage."

Since the FBI conducted a search on former President Donald Trump's Palm Beach, Florida estate, Mar-A-Lago, Trump and his allies have been adamant about getting the search warrant affidavit released to the public, but legal aides are concerned this could backfire, the Washington Post reported.

The Department of Justice requested the court keep this document sealed saying it contains "highly sensitive" information and could have "significant and irreparable damage" to the ongoing investigation of documents the former president took from the White House after his presidency concluded.

After public outcry over unsealing the search warrant, a federal judge obliged making the document that granted the Justice Department access to Trump's office, safe, and other areas of his South Florida residence public. A summary of materials seized by the FBI was also included.

"The Department filed the motion to make public the warrant and receipt in light of the former president's public confirmation of the search, the surrounding circumstances, and the substantial public interest in this matter," Attorney General Merrick Garland said.

However, the affidavit remains sealed.

The affidavit is likely to contain witness names, details about federal law enforcement's search procedures, and evidence. Multiple media outlets, including the Washington Post, have submitted request for the federal court to release the affidavit, whose attorneys cited the "historic importance of these events."

Trump has shared his support for releasing the documents "in the interest of TRANSPARENCY" on the social media platform, Truth Social.

A former senior official with the Justice Department said he doubts there would be anything "good" for the president in the affidavit, the Post reported.

"It's an advocacy document," the official told the Washington Post. The official said that while everything is the document must be true, there is "no exculpatory evidence. It's never a good story for the defendant."

According to the Washington Post, Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart has called for a Thursday afternoon hearing, giving Trump's legal team until Thursday morning to file an official motion with the court for the document to be released. As of Tuesday evening, the Post reported that his attorneys have not done so.

Other legal analysts, cited by the Washington Post, said the resistance to release documents like search warrant affidavits is in line with how investigations are normally conducted.

Matthew Miller, a former spokesperson for the Justice Department told the news outlet, "The Justice Department is one of the few agencies that says transparency for the sake of transparency doesn't always make sense - particularly in an ongoing situation."

The attorney general, who rarely makes public appearances, has openly addressed the investigation a number of times since the search concluded. In a public statement at the Justice Department, Garland said the he authorized the decision to seek a search warrant, called on a judge to release the search warrant and inventory list, excluding the affidavit.

"Merrick Garland has already spent a few more minutes talking about this in public than he normally would," Stephen A. Saltzburg, a George Washington University law professor and former deputy assistant attorney general in the George H.W. Bush administration told the Washington Post. "The tradition in the department is keeping the investigation and sources confidential.

Saltzburg said what makes this case stand out is the fact that this is the "first time they have searched a former president's home."

If convicted, Trump could face a number of charges after the FBI recovered 11 sets of documents, some of which were marked top secret, including violating the Espionage Act.


More Related News

Talk of
Talk of 'Civil War,' Ignited by Mar-a-Lago Search, Is Flaring Online

Soon after the FBI searched Donald Trump's home in Florida for classified documents, online researchers zeroed in on a worrying trend. Posts on Twitter that ...

Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis: A 2022 hurricane could preview the 2024 election
Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Ron DeSantis: A 2022 hurricane could preview the 2024 election

President Joe Biden will be in Florida at the same time as two potential 2024 re-election opponents: Ex-President Donald Trump and Gov. Ron DeSantis.

What exactly was Roger Stone
What exactly was Roger Stone's role in Capitol riot? The next Jan. 6 hearing could tell us

The Jan. 6 committee reportedly has lots of new evidence about Stone's alleged role in Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Will an October surprise matter in Georgia? Walker abortion story a midterm test
Will an October surprise matter in Georgia? Walker abortion story a midterm test

Allegations levied at Republican candidate Herschel Walker may not be a fatal blow in Georgia midterm Senate election, observers say.

What Will It Take for the GOP to Condemn Trump
What Will It Take for the GOP to Condemn Trump's Death Threats?

Photo Illustration by Luis G. Rendon/The Daily Beast/GettyIn 2016, when Donald Trump bragged that he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and he wouldn't lose...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply


Top News: Latin America