Trump lawyers to Supreme Court: Jan. 6 committee 'will not be harmed by delay'




 


Former President Trump's lawyers told the Supreme Court that the House committee probing the Jan. 6 attack would suffer no harm if the justices delayed the transfer of Trump administration records to congressional investigators.

The bold assertion came amid an ongoing legal clash between Trump and the House panel over whether a trove of records that investigators say would shed light on the deadly Capitol riot are covered by the former president's assertion of executive privilege.

Trump's attorneys, in their latest filing, pushed back on the committee's claim that a protracted legal fight threatens to undermine its work.

"Respondents will not be harmed by delay," Trump attorneys wrote, referring to the House panel. "Despite their insistence that the investigation is urgent, more than a year has passed since January 6, 2021. Years remain before the next transition of power."

"The Committee and the Court have time to make a swift but measured analysis of these important issues and make sure that in the rush to conduct its investigation, the Committee does not do irreparable structural damage in the process," they added.

The Jan. 6 committee has not established a hard deadline for completing its investigation, but its chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) has said the panel hopes to wrap up by early spring.

Trump turned to the Supreme Court last month after lower federal courts in Washington, D.C., rejected his request to halt the National Archives from disbursing the records. His attorneys have asked the justices to shield the disputed materials from disclosure while they consider his formal appeal.

In the lower federal courts, judges made quick work in rebuffing Trump's claims. They zeroed in on President Biden's refusal to invoke executive privilege over Trump-era schedules, call logs, emails and other requested documents. Biden declined to do so after determining that the House panel's needs for the records exceeded any benefit of keeping them under wraps.

The House panel, for its part, has emphasized the importance of a prompt resolution in the case.

"The Select Committee's work is of the highest importance and urgency: investigating one of the darkest episodes in our nation's history, a deadly assault on the United States Capitol and Congress, and an unprecedented disruption of the peaceful transfer of power from one President to the next," they told the justices last month.

The prospect of a drawn-out Trump court fight has prompted comparisons to the drain-the-clock litigation strategy he wielded as president, where delay tactics were deployed to stymie lawsuits, hamper investigators and fend off subpoenas, with numerous cases against Trump and his administration still hanging in the balance as he left the White House.

COMMENTS

More Related News

Giuliani meets with U.S. House Jan. 6 panel, CNN reports
Giuliani meets with U.S. House Jan. 6 panel, CNN reports
  • US
  • 2022-05-21 02:05:16Z

Rudy Giuliani, who served as former U.S. President Donald Trump's personal attorney, met for more than nine hours on Friday with the House committee...

Fact check: Tennessee law limits abortion pills, doesn
Fact check: Tennessee law limits abortion pills, doesn't ban Plan B contraceptive

A new Tennessee law imposes penalties on those who improperly distribute abortion medication. It has nothing to do with Plan B contraceptives.

Kansas Supreme Court sides with pizza magnate Gene Bicknell in long-running tax dispute
Kansas Supreme Court sides with pizza magnate Gene Bicknell in long-running tax dispute

In a blow to the Kansas Department of Revenue, the state Supreme Court Friday sided with a pizza magnate in a long-running tax dispute.

On The Money - Prices remain high while stocks sink
On The Money - Prices remain high while stocks sink

Food prices could increase even more amid international export bans. We'll also look at this week's stock market carnage, IRS changes and the continued push ...

Viewpoint: What happens when Oklahoma judges run on partisan ballots?
Viewpoint: What happens when Oklahoma judges run on partisan ballots?
  • US
  • 2022-05-20 22:53:58Z

A 1960s Oklahoma Supreme Court scandal shows partisan judges create a corrupt judicial system.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Latin America