U.S. Supreme Court rules Republicans can defend North Carolina voter ID law




  • In Politics
  • 2022-06-23 15:26:29Z
  • By Reuters
 

By Nate Raymond

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that Republican lawmakers in North Carolina can intervene in a lawsuit challenging a voter ID law that they believed the state's Democratic attorney general was unlikely to defend strongly enough.

In a 8-1 decision https://tmsnrt.rs/3ndjwKA authored by conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, the court ruled that two Republican legislative leaders could join the lawsuit to defend the constitutionality of a 2018 law that Attorney General Josh Stein was already defending.

Gorsuch said Republican-backed state law expressly authorized the lawmakers to participate in cases like this and that a "presumption of adequate representation is inappropriate when a duly authorized state agent seeks to intervene to defend a state law."

"Casting aspersions on no one, this litigation illustrates how divided state governments sometimes warrant participation by multiple state officials in federal court," Gorsuch wrote.

Representatives for Stein and the lawmakers - Philip Berger, the leader of the North Carolina Senate, and Timothy Moore, the leader of the North Carolina House of Representatives - did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The law at issue was intended to implement an amendment to North Carolina's constitution that voters in 2018 approved requiring people going to the polls to present photo identification.

Democrats have accused Republicans of pursuing measures including those requiring voters to show certain forms of identification to cast a ballot in a bid to make it more difficult for certain groups of people who tend to back Democrats to vote in elections. Republicans have said such measures are needed to prevent voting fraud.

Democratic Governor Roy Cooper vetoed the North Carolina bill, but the Republican-led legislature overrode his veto and enacted the law. The NAACP sued, contending the measure discriminated against Black and Latino voters and was unconstitutional.

Stein, a Democrat, had voted against an earlier voter-ID law when he was a state senator. But after the lawsuit was filed, he assumed responsibility for defending the state's board of elections in the case.

Thursday's ruling overturns a decision by the Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which in holding the lawmakers were not entitled to intervene noted Stein had earlier convinced it to overturn an order temporarily blocking enforcement of the law.

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor in a dissent wrote that "the court's conclusion that state respondents inadequately represented petitioners' interests is a fiction that the record does not support."

(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Will Dunham)

COMMENTS

More Related News

Supreme Court: MD officials must enforce anti-picketing laws on abortion rights protests outside justices
Supreme Court: MD officials must enforce anti-picketing laws on abortion rights protests outside justices' homes

An armed man last month allegedly made threats against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh near the justice's suburban Washington, D.C., home.

U.S. Supreme Court asks Maryland to bar protests at justices
U.S. Supreme Court asks Maryland to bar protests at justices' homes
  • US
  • 2022-07-02 19:07:42Z

The U.S. Supreme Court's top security officer has asked Maryland Governor Larry Hogan to enforce laws barring picketing outside the Maryland homes of high...

Australians rally against U.S. overturning of key abortion ruling
Australians rally against U.S. overturning of key abortion ruling
  • US
  • 2022-07-02 06:47:45Z

Thousands of Australians joined raucous protests across the country on Saturday against the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of women's constitutional right ...

Abortion drug maker says Mississippi can
Abortion drug maker says Mississippi can't ban pill despite Supreme Court ruling
  • US
  • 2022-07-01 17:17:39Z

(Reuters) -The maker of a drug used in medication abortions has told a federal judge that the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling eliminating the nationwide...

Explainer-How the conservative Supreme Court is reshaping U.S. law
Explainer-How the conservative Supreme Court is reshaping U.S. law
  • US
  • 2022-07-01 16:52:33Z

The U.S. Supreme Court's most consequential term in decades, with blockbuster rulings on abortion, guns, religion and climate change policy, illustrated how ...

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

Comments

Top News: Politics